I’m two weeks in to my new job at St. Ambrose University in Davenport, IA. I’m the newest tenure-track faculty member in the School of Education. This semester I’m teaching the Theory of Arithmetic (Elementary Mathematics Methods/Content course) and Pre-Calculus. It seems as though the last few weeks many people in my life have been talking about money . . . my husband talking about the lack of my paycheck (a slight annoyance when starting a new job . . . the one month lag in pay!), my students talking about the cost of textbooks, and everyone else at the University talking about the rising cost of tuition and the shrinking amount of state aid/student scholarships. With money on the mind, I thought it’d be nice to check in with my stellar mathematics student from a few years ago who started a reverse savings plan during the first week of 2014. (Remember her?) If not, check out the posts here and here. I’m checking in to see how she’s been doing and I’ll update you soon!
2π = τ, which means that tomorrow is Tau Day! (Remember 3/14 is Pi Day, since Pi ≈ 3.14). Since tomorrow is 6/28 (or 2(3.14)) tomorrow, June 28 is Tau Day! How will you celebrate? Might I suggest you celebrate with 2 pies?
For more Tau Day fun check out my Pi Day activities . . . just do them twice!
This year I asked for a FitBit for my birthday. (For those of you that don’t know a FitBit is a pedometer, counting your steps, flights of stairs, daily active minutes, and approximate number of calories burned). I was excited and curious to clip on my FitBit and see just how far I was walking every day!
But, after a few, short days I was a little confused. I thought that about 2,000 walking steps = 1 mile, but I was getting FitBit read-outs on my phone that looked like this:
So, if you’ve been reading this blog for any amount of time, you can probably guess what I did next . . .Yep, I Googled the length of a walking step and discovered that this website (which seems legit to me) estimates that the average length of a person’s walking step is about 2.5 ft, which means that in order for a person with average walking steps to walk 5 miles, they’d have to take 10,560 steps . . . not 10,000.
Then, I started wondering how long my steps were (on average of course); compared to the published average of 2.5 feet/step. I used my FitBit output for 3 different days
and discovered that, despite my relatively short legs my walking stride length was pretty average!
Then, I started thinking about a project I used to have some of my students work one, which is now an activity on the NCTM Illuminations Site, called Walking to Class.
This summer, make a walking strides chart of your day (or a trip to and from the park, pool, etc.) but instead of measuring distance in steps, change the units from steps to miles using the average 2.5 foot length, or you could dust off a pedometer and calculate the length of your actual stride!
It’s safe to say that thunderstorm season has officially arrived in Iowa! The temperature and the humidity has been on a steady climb for the last couple of weeks (remember when we were making jokes about how cold it was?!?) and seasoned midwesterners can spot the ideal weather for a good thunderstorm from miles away!
I love thunderstorms! For some reason, they always prompt me to bake a batch of chocolate chips cookies whenever they roll through! (There’s nothing quite like watching the clouds roll in while you chow down on homemade cookie dough!) Unfortunately, my children do not share my affinity for thunderstorms, not even the promise of warm chocolate chip cookies can calm their nerves when the thunder starts booming and the lightening flashes!
Last week a quick thunderstorm rolled up in the middle of dinner. Instead of focusing on the scary booms and flashes I said to them “Did you know if you count the number of seconds between when you see the lightening and hear the thunder, you can estimate the distance the thunderstorm is from our house?” (P.S. Did you know that?)
The speed of sound through the air is approximately 340 meters per second, and the speed of light is approximately 300 million meters per second. Even though thunder claps and lightening flashes are happening at the same time, the difference in speed makes it seem as though the lightening is flashing before the thunder.
Using the relationship between distance, rate, and time we know that D = R*t, where D is distance, R is rate, and t is time. Since we have the rate of sound and light in meters and seconds, we’ll also report D and t in terms of meters and seconds.
Now, suppose you hear thunder approximately 5 seconds after you see a flash of lightening. If we use the relationship between distance, rate, and time we can substitute known values into the equation, which gives us D = 340*5 = 1700 (remember this is meters). 1700 meters is approximately 1 mile.
The next time a thunderstorm rolls up in your neighborhood, see if you can track how quickly its moving through the area. Keep a record of the length of time between lightening flashes and thunder rumbles. Can you tell when the storm is getting closer and farther away from you?
P.S. I got my facts and figures from two great sources: the National Weather Service and The Department of Physics at the University of Illinois Urbana Champaign.
About 19 weeks ago I told you about a former student of mine who was starting her 52 week reverse savings plan. (If you don’t remember, you can check out the post here).
Well, if she’s kept up with her New Year’s Resolution, she should have made 19 deposits by now . . . for a total of
52+51+50+49+48+47+46+ . . . .
(Please tell me you’re not really adding these?!?–Remember, just ask yourself “What would Gauss do?)
$817!!! (Former student of mine, if you’re still on the Reverse Savings Plan Way to Go! $817 is a lot of money!)
Wow! In just 19 weeks time or 37% of the year), she’s been able to save nearly 60% of her total goal!
Maybe she should just give up on the rest of the plan? I mean, $817!
Let’s suppose she’s putting that money into her savings account. Last year, CNN Money reports that, on average, people made about 0.06% interest on the money in their account.
Let’s compare the two amounts:
If she stops today: $817 If she stops in 33 weeks: $1378 (her goal)
One year from now: $817.49 One year from now: $1378.83 (off to college)
Five years from now: $819.45 Five years from now: $1382.14 (graduates from college)
Ten years from now: $821.92 Ten years from now: $1386.29
20 years from now: $826.86 20 years from now: $1394.64
50 years from now: $841.88 50 years from now: $1419.97
Total Amount of Interest earned: $24.88 vs. $41.97
The moral of the story? Keep on keeping on (and throw an extra few bucks in each month if you can!)
A few weekends ago I took my kids to a great kite festival in a near-by small town. It was amazing! There were huge kites, small kites, kite flying demonstrations, and even professional kite flyers! Although the kite festival was really fun, there was one, small snag.
The organizers of the event advertised that kids would be able to make their own kites. This was the big draw for my kids, so as soon as we got out of the car, we made a beeline for the kite making station! Imagine our excitement when we were the second family in line!
Then, imagine our frustration as we continued to stand in the line for the next 30 minutes. The problem? The kite builders were trying to have each of the children literally build. a. kite. They had purchase dowel rods and parachute fabric. The idea was this . . . use a saw to cut the dowel rods. Then, use a very teeny, tiny drill to drill holes at the ends of said dowel rods. Next, tape the dowels together in a “+” and string tread through the holes to make the outline of the kite. Finally, cut a piece of parachute fabric to cover the dowels and the edge of the kite and sew a hem around the entire perimeter of the kite with needle and thread.
Now, I have to say the up side of all of this? The kites were legit kites . . . they probably would have actually flown! The down side? Every single child in line was under the age of 10 (interpretation–no one could do this on their own). The station was set up so that only one child at a time could make the kites.
Finally, I leaned down to my kids and said . . . “Let’s go to a craft store, I’ll get the stuff to make the kites and we can do this at home!”
I made this offer numerous times, and about the 4th or 5th time I offered/begged them to get out of line, they finally agreed!
Now, we were going to make our own kites! I headed to a craft store to get the supplies (which, by the way they don’t have parachute fabric!) and ended up with three, 36″ dowel rods, some fabric, and kite string. We were ready to start making the kites!
Now, when you use the term “kite” it can mean many, many things. There are kites like the kinds we saw flying that day, there are geometric shapes called kites, and there are kite graphs. For this post I’m talking about kites that fly, but that are also in the shape of the geometric figure called a kite.
The definition of a kite is: a convex quadrilateral with two adjacent, congruent sides (length a) and two other congruent, adjacent sides (length b). A rhombus is a special case of the kite. The diagonals of a kite and perpendicular to each other, and one of the diagonals bisects the other diagonal.
I couldn’t make a rhombus kite, because I only had 3 dowels and two kids who wanted kites of their own. And, it’d be really nice to only have to cut one of the dowels, instead of all 3 of them. Meaning, I’d like each of the kites to have one of the diagonals be length 36.” The length of the other diagonal was up for debate, however . . .as long as it was at most 18″. So, here’s what I knew . . .
blue = dowel rods
red = string
So, I’m wondering . . . given these parameters what would you design the kite to look like? How could you minimize the amount of string needed? What about the amount of fabric needed to cover the entire kite?
This morning thousands and thousands of people did something I can not even imagine doing . . . they ran the Boston Marathon (It was actually 35,671 entrants to be exact)!
This year the winning men’s time was 2:08:37 (Meb Keflezighi from California) . . . that’s an average speed of about 1 mile every 4.88 minutes. (As a comparison I re-started Couch-to-5K last night . . . and I ran about 1 mile every 11 minutes).
Anyway, the whole Boston Marathon thing got me thinking . . . I wonder how Meb’s time compares to other people who have won the Boston Marathon?
The first Boston Marathon was run in 1917. John J. McDermott (NY) won that race with a time of 2:55:10. He was still averaging about 1 mile every almost 7 minutes. So, is Meb just exceptionally fast? Was John just exceptionally slow?
The graph above represents all of the Boston Marathon times–from John to Meb and all of the marathoners in between. What do the data seem to tell you? Was John exceptionally slow? What about Meb?
This shows the average time for 10 year time spans of Boston Marathon winners. What seems to be happening to marathon times-over time?
If you had to model Boston Marathon winning times, based on the number of years since the first marathon what type of model would you use? Exponential Growth/Decay? Linear Increase/Decrease? Quadratic model? Why? Do you think there might be anything noteworthy about the graph as people continue running the marathon? Will anyone ever run the marathon in under 2 hours? 1 hour? (if someone ran a marathon in under an hour they would be averaging 1 mile approximately every 2.25 minutes)
I’d love to know what you think! In the meantime . . . I’ll be trying to get under the 10 minute mile mark with my Couch-to-5k app!